Browsing by Author "Lin, Li"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Impact of aging vs. estrogen loss on cardiac gene expression: estrogen replacement and inflammation(2011) Pechenino, Angela S; Lin, Li; Mbai, Fiona N; Lee, Alison R; He, Xian-Min; Stallone, John N; Knowlton, AADespite an abundance of evidence to the contrary from animal studies, large clinical trials on humans have shown that estrogen administered to postmenopausal women increases the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, timing may be everything, as estrogen is often administered immediately after ovariectomy (Ovx) in animal studies, while estrogen administration in human studies occurred many years postmenopause. This study investigates the discrepancy by administering 17β-estradiol (E2) in a slow-release capsule to Norway Brown rats both immediately following Ovx and 9 wk post-Ovx (Late), and studying differences in gene expression between these two groups compared with age-matched Ovx and sham-operated animals. Two different types of microarray were used to analyze the left ventricles from these groups: an Affymetrix array (n = 3/group) and an inflammatory cytokines and receptors PCR array (n = 4/group). Key genes were analyzed by Western blotting. Ovx without replacement led to an increase in caspase 3, caspase 9, calpain 2, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)9, and TNF-α. Caspase 6, STAT3, and CD11b increased in the Late group, while tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2, MMP14, and collagen I α1 were decreased. MADD and fibronectin were increased in both Ovx and Late. TNF-α and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) protein levels increased with Late replacement. Many of these changes were prevented by early E2 replacement. These findings suggest that increased expression of inflammatory genes, such as TNF-α and iNOS, may be involved in some of the deleterious effects of delayed E2 administration seen in human studiesItem Reply to “Letter to the Editor: ‘Understanding the WHI gap’(2012) Pechenino, Angela S; Lee, Alison R; Lin, Li; Mbai, Fiona N; Stallone, John N; Knowlton, AAThis is a reply in response to Drs. Kerber's and Turner's commentary about our article (10) in Physiological Genomics. We thank Kerber and Turner for their enthusiastic response to our article and are pleased that they found it useful in their practice (10). However, we would like to point out that the link between estrogen therapy postmenopause and a decrease in dementia in older women is tenuous at best. Few studies indicate definitively that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) results in a decrease in dementia, and most only point toward a possibility that has yet to be realized (5). Basic studies in rodent models suggest that estrogen replacement can reduce brain injury in models of stroke, but more work is needed before taking these findings to the clinical setting (1). Additionally, the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and the Million Woman Study indicate that breast cancer risk increases significantly when women are put on HRT, specifically with estrogen and progesterone taken in combination, a finding that should limit the use of HRT to those women who do not already manifest a high risk for breast cancer (2, 9). In contrast to chronic estrogen replacement, there is a small, but growing, literature supporting a role for a protective role of estrogen in acute injury (11–13). We and others have found that treatment with a high concentration of 17β-estradiol at the time of injury can greatly reduce inflammation and apoptosis (3, 4, 6, 14). Such limited use of E2 will not increase the risk of cancer but does have the possibility of greatly reducing tissue injury. We feel that a more promising area for the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms comes from the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). For example, raloxifene improved verbal memory in postmenopausal women when given over a period of 5 yr.(7) In contrast tamoxifen, a SERM that is primarily an estrogen antagonist, was associated with poorer performance on letter fluency and manual dexterity in women with breast cancer compared with untreated controls (8). Many SERMs have been synthesized, and some may have the positive, protective effects of estrogen without promoting cell proliferation and cancer. More work will be needed identifying the specific effects of these compounds before this type of treatment can be applied in the clinic to ameliorate aging-associated changes such as cardiovascular disease and dementia